ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Purpose Zygomatic implants (ZI) constitute a suitable alternative for treating severe maxillary atrophy. However, a large number of complications associated with ZI have been reported in the literature. This paper presents the late complications associated with ZI during 12 years of experience in the same institution. Materials and methods All cases of ZI from 2000 to 2013 were retrospectively evaluated and the major complications relating to this type of rehabilitation were selected to report. Results The major complications found were: loss of implant, loss of osseointegration, bucco-sinusal communication, fenestration of alveolar mucosa, sinus pathology, and emergency palate fixations. Conclusion The clinical experience of the dental surgeon is critical in the success of zygomatic fixation. Furthermore, there should be careful planning of rehabilitation to reduce the rate of complications.
Subject(s)
Humans , Zygoma/surgery , Maxillary Diseases/surgery , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported/adverse effects , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/adverse effects , Atrophy , Maxillary Diseases/rehabilitation , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Dental Restoration FailureABSTRACT
The procedure of maxillary sinus lifting using autogenous bone was considered the reference standard choice for oral rehabilitation in cases of severe atrophic maxilla. However, it is not always a viable option, due to the limitations or morbidity caused by grafting techniques. This has led to the development of bone substitutes, which have been elaborated and improved. Choosing the best biomaterial becomes difficult due to the wide variety of bone substitutes. The aim of this article is to present some of these materials that are reported in the current scientific literature for maxillary sinus lifting.
El procedimiento de elevación del seno maxilar utilizando hueso autógeno se consideraba la opción estándar de oro para la rehabilitación oral en casos de maxilar atrófico grave. Sin embargo, no siempre es una opción viable, debido a las limitaciones o a la morbilidad causada por técnicas de injerto, lo que justifica la existencia de sustitutos óseos que han sido elaborados y mejorados. En cuanto a la amplia variedad de sustitutos óseos, se hace difícil la mejor elección de biomaterial. El objetivo de este informe es presentar una variedad de sustitutos óseos respetados en la literatura científica actual, usados en la elevación del seno maxilar.